Englobo Residential Red Flags Assessment
DA Leads logo DA LEADS.
Planning & Environment Red Flags12 July 2026
Subject Site

Truganina Englobo Residential Screening (demo)

VIC · Englobo Residential · 10.5 ha drawn boundary
Assessment Readout No fatal flaws identified

No Major red flags across the 19 assessable constraint(s). 2 Moderate constraint(s) require mitigation through the development application.

2 Moderate 10 Minor 7 Insignificant
To
Site selection lead (sample)
From
DA Leads Planning Intelligence
Date
12 July 2026
Site boundary for Truganina Englobo Residential Screening (demo) with dimensions and area on the standard map
State VIC
Zone UGZ2
Site area 10.5 ha
Nearest dwelling 125 m
Background

Instructions & Purpose

Desktop red flags screening of a candidate Englobo Residential site prior to formal feasibility.

Identify potential fatal flaws and material planning and environmental constraints to inform site selection.

Approach

Methodology & Caveats

This is a desktop red flags screen. The drawn site boundary was intersected against national and state planning, hazard and environmental spatial layers, supplemented by state planning services and an SRTM elevation model. Each constraint is rated on the four-level scale, and where data is unavailable for the state it is flagged for survey rather than assumed clear.

How this screen was produced

  • Spatial intersection of the site polygon against the mapped constraint layers
  • State planning service queries for zoning, overlays and the nearest residential receptor
  • Terrain analysis (slope and visibility) from a 30m elevation model
  • Rule-based rating per constraint, with a data status recorded separately from the rating

Limitations

  • Mapped vector data is generalised at zoom and is not survey accurate; boundaries and distances are indicative.
  • Data coverage varies by state. Constraints flagged data-limited require a specialist survey and are NOT low-risk.
  • EPBC matters are screened by proximity and mapped layers only; a Protected Matters Search Tool report and self-assessment are still required.
  • This screen does not replace a title search, specialist assessments, modelling, or the formal development application.
01 / Site Context

Site & Surrounds

The candidate site and its surrounding land uses, derived from the drawn boundary and surrounding spatial data.

Site and surrounds: drawn site boundary with the nearest dwelling marked 125 m away
Figure 1 Site and surrounds — drawn site boundary, indicative project footprint and nearest dwelling on current satellite imagery. Screening exhibit only, not a survey or cadastral plan.
Address374, Forsyth Road, The Crossing, Truganina, Melbourne, Victoria, 3029, Australia
Site area (drawn)10.5 ha
StateVIC
ZoneUGZ2 - URBAN GROWTH ZONE - SCHEDULE 2
CouncilWyndham
Nearest dwelling125 m
Nearest HV power530 m (66 kV)
Nearest conservation areaTruganina South N.C.R. (about 1638 m)
02 / Planning Controls

Zoning & Overlays

Statutory planning controls that apply to the site.

ZoneUGZ2 - URBAN GROWTH ZONE - SCHEDULE 2
OverlayDescription
DCPO9DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN OVERLAY - SCHEDULE 9
03 / Method

Risk Rating Scale

Each constraint is rated on a four-level scale. Constraints that could not be assessed from available data are shown separately and are not treated as low risk.

Major

Significant; likely to preclude development unless rectified (potential fatal flaw).

Moderate

Significant; will need to be mitigated.

Minor

Evident but not significant; readily mitigated.

Insignificant

No constraint on development proceeding.

Data not available

Could not be assessed from available data; further investigation required. This is NOT a low-risk finding.

04 / Red Flags

Constraint Summary

Traffic-light screening of each constraint. See the following section for the assessment and mitigation behind each rating.

Zoning
Zone (UGZ2 - URBAN GROWTH ZONE - SCHEDULE 2) returned; assessment pathway to confirm.
Minor
Cadastral / Title & Easements
No infrastructure corridor crosses the site in the mapped data; title, lot/plan and easements are not desktop-verifiable, so order a title search.
Minor
Planning Overlays
1 overlay(s) apply: DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN OVERLAY - SCHEDULE 9
Minor
Aboriginal Heritage
Outside a mapped Area of Cultural Heritage Sensitivity; protection still applies (a sensitivity model, not a site register).
Minor
Historic / Federal Heritage
No listed historic heritage place within 1km.
Insignificant
Bushfire
Site is not within a mapped bushfire prone area.
Insignificant
Flora & Fauna / Ecology
Threatened biota, native vegetation or a nearby reserve identified.
Moderate
EPBC / Matters of National Significance
A Matter of National Environmental Significance is likely triggered; EPBC referral required.
Moderate
Hydrology / Flooding
No mapped flood hazard or overlay affects the site.
Insignificant
Noise (residential amenity)
Sensitive-use development; external noise sources affecting the future dwellings must be identified (no noise-source layer is queried on a desktop).
Minor
Visual Amenity
Terrain visibility moderate; Site at 32.0m has mixed surrounding terrain (6 points lower, 13 higher, 5 similar). Partia
Minor
Contours / Topography
Mean site slope about 1.4% from the SRTM 30m elevation model.
Insignificant
Geotechnical
Not desktop-assessable; intrusive geotechnical investigation required.
Minor
Soils
Reactive or dispersive soils indicated (Sodosols).
Minor
Utilities (power / gas / water / NBN)
Transmission line within 530m (66kV); Gas transmission pipeline within 2533m; Water / sewer main within 301m
Insignificant
Traffic & Access
Residential development; a Traffic Impact Assessment scaled to the lot yield is required, with intersection and road upgrade requirements set through the DA.
Minor
Contaminated Land
No EPA-listed contaminated site within 500m.
Insignificant
Air Quality
Non-combustion project; air quality limited to construction dust.
Minor
Hazard & Risk (fire / explosion)
A residential development carries no industrial on-site fire / explosion hazard. The hazard question runs the other way: separation FROM surrounding hazardous facilities, pipelines and major infrastructure must be confirmed, and bushfire / flood exposure of the future dwellings is rated under those constraints.
Insignificant
05 / Approvals

Approvals Pathway

Indicative approvals a project of this type would typically require.

ApprovalAuthorityTrigger
State planning consentResponsible authority / Minister for PlanningApplicable state planning legislation
EPBC referral (if MNES significantly impacted)DCCEEW (Commonwealth)Potential significant impact on a Matter of National Environmental Significance
Native vegetation clearanceState native vegetation authorityClearance of native vegetation
Utility connections (power / water / sewer)Distribution network and utility providersNew connections and any augmentation the development requires
05b / Precedents

Comparable Approved Projects

Recent comparable projects that have been approved on a similar assessment pathway. Precedents de-risk the approval thesis; they are indicative only and each project's assessment turns on its own merits.

ProjectScaleApproval pathwayYear
Shepparton South East Precinct Structure Plan
Recent Victorian PSP approval; the PSP + DCP is the englobo enabling instrument.
About 2,980 dwellings / 7,200 residentsPSP and Development Contributions Plan approved by the Minister for Planning and gazetted 26 June 2025 (Amendment C117gshe).2025
source
Appin (Part) Precinct rezoning, Greater Macarthur
Large NSW englobo rezoning; infrastructure-linked dwelling caps shape the release program.
1,378 ha rezoned for up to 12,900 homes (about 470 ha conserved for koala corridors)Precinct rezoning finalised 15 December 2023 with a precinct structure plan and DCP; staged dwelling caps apply pending infrastructure delivery.2023
source
06 / Detailed Review

Review of Planning & Environmental Considerations

Each constraint with the desktop findings, the legislation that applies, the risk table and the checks required before reliance.

1
Zoning
Minor

The site is zoned UGZ2 - URBAN GROWTH ZONE - SCHEDULE 2. This zoning represents a minor constraint, and an assessment pathway is required to confirm the specific planning requirements and development provisions applicable to the project under this schedule.

Legislation: State planning legislation and the applicable planning scheme / Planning and Design Code

Zoning mapped near the drawn site boundary on current satellite imagery
Figure 2 Zoning — mapped features near the drawn site boundary on current satellite imagery. Screening exhibit only; confirm against the source dataset and a planner.
AspectRiskMitigationRating
Applicable zone Site zoned UGZ2 - URBAN GROWTH ZONE - SCHEDULE 2; compatibility to confirm
  • Confirm the use is envisaged or assessable under the zone provisions
Minor
Required checks
  • Confirm zone provisions and the assessment pathway with the planning authority
2
Cadastral / Title & Easements
Survey required Minor

No mapped easement or infrastructure corridor crosses the site in the available data. However, because title, lot/plan, and easements are not desktop-verifiable, this is a data-limited constraint. A registered title search must be ordered to confirm the presence of any controlling easements.

Legislation: Real Property / Land Title Act (state land registry); Survey and cadastral standards (state)

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Title and encumbrances Lot/plan, ownership, covenants, caveats and easements are not confirmed from desktop data
  • Order Certificate of Title and plan of subdivision from the land registry (about 1 week, ~$50)
  • Confirm a single registered owner, or consolidate parcels, before lodging the development application
Minor
Required checks
  • Order a Certificate of Title and plan of subdivision from the state land registry
  • Commission a survey-grade boundary identification if the project proceeds to design
3
Planning Overlays
Minor

The site is subject to one planning overlay, being the DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN OVERLAY - SCHEDULE 9. This overlay represents a minor constraint that will need to be addressed through the planning and development process.

Legislation: Applicable planning scheme / Planning and Design Code overlays

AspectRiskMitigationRating
DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN OVERLAY - SCHEDULE 9 The DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN OVERLAY - SCHEDULE 9 overlay adds assessment requirements to the development application
  • Address the DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN OVERLAY - SCHEDULE 9 overlay objectives in the development application design
Minor
Required checks
  • Review each overlay schedule and address its objectives in the development application
4
Aboriginal Heritage
Minor

The site is located outside a mapped Area of Cultural Heritage Sensitivity, meaning there is no automatic requirement for a Cultural Heritage Management Plan. However, general aboriginal heritage protection still applies across the site as the sensitivity mapping is a model rather than a complete site register.

Legislation: Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 (Vic)

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Cultural heritage sensitivity Outside a statutory sensitivity area; protection applies regardless
  • Unexpected finds procedure
  • Heritage advice if scope changes
Minor
Required checks
  • Unexpected finds procedure during ground-disturbing works
  • Confirm with a Heritage Advisor if the activity is high-impact
5
Historic / Federal Heritage
Insignificant

There are no listed historic heritage places located within 1km of the site. Historic and federal heritage is considered an insignificant constraint for this project based on the desktop assessment.

Legislation: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth); State heritage legislation

Historic / Federal Heritage mapped near the drawn site boundary on current satellite imagery
Figure 3 Historic / Federal Heritage — mapped features near the drawn site boundary on current satellite imagery. Screening exhibit only; confirm against the source dataset and a planner.
AspectRiskMitigationRating
Heritage places No listed heritage place within 1km
  • Unexpected finds procedure for built heritage
Insignificant
Required checks
  • Confirm against the Australian Heritage Database and the state heritage register
6
Bushfire
Insignificant

The site is not located within a mapped bushfire prone area, and no bushfire hazard area intersects the site. Bushfire risk is considered an insignificant constraint for the proposed development.

Legislation: Australian Standard AS 3959; State bushfire planning provisions

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Bushfire risk Not within a mapped bushfire prone area
  • Standard fire safety provisions
Insignificant
Required checks
  • Confirm the classification with the fire authority before detailed design
7
Flora & Fauna / Ecology
Moderate

The site intersects threatened biota and native vegetation, specifically the Southern Plains including the Western Victorian volcanic plain and karst springs. This represents a moderate ecological constraint that will require further investigation.

Legislation: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth); State native vegetation / biodiversity legislation

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Threatened biota / native vegetation Clearance or disturbance of mapped threatened community or native vegetation
  • Ecological assessment
  • Native vegetation clearance approval / offsets
  • EPBC self-assessment
Moderate
Required checks
  • Flora and fauna survey by a qualified ecologist
  • Native vegetation clearance assessment and offsets if required
  • EPBC Act self-assessment / referral if a listed matter may be significantly impacted
8
EPBC / Matters of National Significance
Moderate

A Matter of National Environmental Significance is likely triggered as an MNES threatened community or reserve intersects or adjoins the site. This is a moderate constraint that will require an EPBC referral.

Legislation: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)

AspectRiskMitigationRating
MNES impact Potential significant impact on a listed matter
  • EPBC referral to DCCEEW
  • Targeted MNES surveys
  • Avoid / mitigate / offset
Moderate
Required checks
  • Generate a Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) report for the site
  • Self-assess against the nine MNES and refer to DCCEEW if a significant impact is likely
9
Hydrology / Flooding
Insignificant

No mapped flood hazard or overlay intersects the site. However, because the site is very flat with a slope of approximately 1.4%, internal stormwater drainage and finished levels remain design constraints. A numeric 1% AEP level must be sourced from the council floodplain study.

Legislation: State flood policy and the applicable planning scheme flooding controls

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Flooding No mapped flood hazard over the site
  • Set finished floor / equipment levels above the design flood level
  • Stormwater detention and overland flow management
Insignificant
Internal site drainage Flat grade (~1.4%) drains poorly and can pond
  • Engineered stormwater detention and overland flow path
  • Confirm the 1% AEP level with the floodplain authority (council flood study)
Minor
Required checks
  • Confirm the relevant flood level (e.g. 1% AEP) with the floodplain authority
  • Prepare a stormwater management strategy and set finished levels accordingly
10
Noise (residential amenity)
Survey required Minor

The proposed residential development is a sensitive use, meaning external noise sources such as roads, rail, and industry must be assessed. Existing dwellings are located nearby, with the nearest approximately 125m away, and 8641 dwellings sit within 2000m, which provides context for the urban interface.

Legislation: Environment Protection Regulations 2021 (Vic) noise provisions

Noise (residential amenity) mapped near the drawn site boundary on current satellite imagery
Figure 4 Noise (residential amenity) — mapped features near the drawn site boundary on current satellite imagery. Screening exhibit only; confirm against the source dataset and a planner.
AspectRiskMitigationRating
External noise on future dwellings The subdivision inherits its noise environment; sources must be identified and assessed at design stage
  • External noise assessment
  • Layout / setback / treatment response
Minor
Required checks
  • Identify external noise sources (road / rail / industry / aircraft) and assess against residential noise criteria
  • Set dwelling setbacks, lot layout or acoustic treatments where criteria are exceeded
11
Visual Amenity
Minor

The terrain visibility for the site is rated as moderate. The site sits at an elevation of 32.0m within a mixed surrounding terrain, featuring 6 points lower, 13 points higher, and 5 points of similar elevation.

Legislation: Applicable planning scheme amenity and landscape provisions

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Visual amenity Some visual exposure to surrounding receptors
  • Siting and screening
  • Landscape concept plan
  • Low-reflectivity finishes
Minor
Required checks
  • Visual impact assessment with photomontages from key viewpoints
  • Landscape concept plan to limit visibility from sensitive receptors
12
Contours / Topography
Insignificant

The site features a very gentle topography with a mean slope of approximately 1.4% based on the SRTM 30m elevation model. Topography is considered an insignificant constraint for the development.

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Slope / earthworks Gentle slope (1.4%); minimal earthworks
  • Cut and fill balance
  • Drainage and erosion control
Insignificant
Required checks
  • Confirm levels and gradients with a feature and level survey
13
Geotechnical
Survey required Minor

Geotechnical conditions are not desktop-assessable, making this a data-limited constraint. An intrusive, on-site geotechnical investigation is required to confirm the ground conditions and suitability for construction.

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Foundation conditions Unknown ground conditions until investigated
  • Geotechnical investigation
  • Foundation design to investigation findings
Minor
Required checks
  • Commission a geotechnical investigation (boreholes / test pits) at detailed design
14
Soils
Minor

Desktop findings indicate the presence of Sodosols, which are characterized as reactive or dispersive soils. This soil class represents a minor constraint that will need to be managed during engineering design and construction.

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Soils Reactive / dispersive soils indicated (Sodosols)
  • Soil management plan as required
  • Foundation design to soil conditions
Minor
Required checks
  • Confirm soil conditions in the geotechnical investigation
15
Utilities (power / gas / water / NBN)
Insignificant

A 66kV transmission line is located within 530m of the site, a water or sewer main is within 301m, and a gas transmission pipeline is located within 2533m. These existing utility services represent an insignificant constraint for the project.

Legislation: National Electricity Rules (connection); Gas pipeline access regulation

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Electricity grid connection Transmission line within 530m (66kV)
  • Network connection study with the transmission operator
Insignificant
Gas connection Gas transmission pipeline within 2533m
  • Gas connection study if a gas project
Insignificant
Water / sewer Water / sewer main within 301m
  • Servicing strategy with the water utility
Insignificant
Telecommunications (NBN) Coverage not queryable from the raster layer
  • Confirm via Dial Before You Dig and the carrier
Data not available
Required checks
  • Network connection study with the transmission operator
  • Servicing strategy for water, sewer and telecommunications
16
Traffic & Access
Survey required Minor

This residential development will generate operational traffic from its own residents, with intersection and external road upgrades typically determined through the development application and contributions framework. Construction traffic will also occur during civil works, representing a minor, data-limited constraint.

Legislation: State road / planning authority traffic impact and OSOM permit requirements

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Resident traffic and access Intersection capacity and external road upgrades are set through the DA
  • Traffic Impact Assessment scaled to the lot yield
  • Internal road hierarchy and access design to the council standard
Minor
Construction traffic Heavy-vehicle movements during civil works
  • Construction Traffic Management Plan
Minor
Required checks
  • Traffic Impact Assessment scaled to the proposed lot yield
17
Contaminated Land
Insignificant

There are no EPA-listed contaminated sites located within 500m of the site. Contaminated land is considered an insignificant constraint for the proposed residential development.

Legislation: State contaminated land / environment protection legislation

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Contaminated land No EPA-listed contaminated site within 500m
  • Phase 1 ESA
  • Remediation / management if confirmed
Insignificant
Required checks
  • Phase 1 environmental site assessment if prior industrial use is suspected
18
Air Quality
Minor

As an englobo residential project, there are no operational combustion emissions associated with the development. Air quality impacts are a minor constraint and will be limited to temporary dust generation during the construction phase.

Legislation: State environment protection (air quality) policy; National Environment Protection (Ambient Air Quality) Measure

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Construction phase Dust from earthworks and construction traffic
  • Construction air quality management plan
  • Dust suppression
Minor
Operational phase No combustion emissions
  • Standard management
Insignificant
Required checks
  • Construction air quality management plan
19
Hazard & Risk (fire / explosion)
Insignificant

The residential use carries no industrial on-site fire or explosion hazards. The primary hazard consideration is ensuring adequate separation from surrounding hazardous facilities, pipelines, and licensed dangerous-goods sites, which must be confirmed during the planning process.

Legislation: State planning provisions for residential development near hazardous facilities

AspectRiskMitigationRating
Surrounding hazards Residential is the sensitive use; separation from external hazardous facilities must be confirmed
  • Hazardous-facility and pipeline separation check
Insignificant
Required checks
  • Identify licensed hazardous facilities and pipelines near the site and confirm the applicable separation / risk contours
Next Steps

Recommended Action Plan

A phased sequence to take this site from screening towards a lodged development application.

PhaseActions
Immediate (week 1 to 2)
  • Order a Certificate of Title and plan of subdivision from the state land registry
Pre-DA specialist work (week 3 to 12)
  • Confirm zone provisions and the assessment pathway with the planning authority
  • Commission a survey-grade boundary identification if the project proceeds to design
  • Flora and fauna survey by a qualified ecologist
  • Native vegetation clearance assessment and offsets if required
  • EPBC Act self-assessment / referral if a listed matter may be significantly impacted
  • Generate a Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) report for the site
Detailed design
  • Review each overlay schedule and address its objectives in the development application
  • Unexpected finds procedure during ground-disturbing works
  • Confirm with a Heritage Advisor if the activity is high-impact
  • Confirm against the Australian Heritage Database and the state heritage register
  • Confirm the classification with the fire authority before detailed design
  • Self-assess against the nine MNES and refer to DCCEEW if a significant impact is likely
Conclusion

No fatal flaws identified

No Major red flags across the 19 assessable constraint(s). 2 Moderate constraint(s) require mitigation through the development application.

Key risks to manage: Flora & Fauna / Ecology; EPBC / Matters of National Significance.

Indicative screening fee: A$1000 per site.

Attachment A

Indicative Scope of Work & Fees

Indicative scope and fees to take this site from screening to a lodged development application. The site screen is a fixed fee; later phases are scoped against the red flags identified above and are a small fraction of the cost of progressing an unscreened site to formal feasibility.

TaskDetail
Site screening (this report)Desktop red flags across planning and environmental constraints to confirm no fatal flaw before feasibility spend.
Title and cadastral reviewCertificate of Title, plan of subdivision, easements and ownership consolidation.
Pre-lodgement planning adviceConfirm the zone pathway and overlay requirements with the planning authority.
Specialist assessments (as triggered)Flora and fauna, heritage, noise, air quality, bushfire, hydrology and geotechnical scopes set by the red flags above.
Development application preparation and lodgementCompile and lodge the development application with the supporting specialist reports.
ItemIndicative fee (ex GST)
Red flags site screen (per site)A$1,000
Title and cadastral reviewA$0.5K to A$1K
Pre-lodgement planning adviceA$3K to A$6K
Flora and fauna assessmentA$15K to A$30K
Heritage assessment / CHMPA$10K to A$40K
Noise assessmentA$15K to A$25K
Geotechnical investigationA$10K to A$25K
Development application preparationA$30K to A$60K

Fees are indicative ranges excluding GST and vary with site complexity and the assessments triggered.