QLD 4750 Census 2021 + Live DA Data

Bucasia

Almost everything here is a freestanding house: 91.2% of dwellings are separate houses and just 1.9% are apartments, an unusually detached profile for a coastal suburb north of Mackay. The median house price of $472,000 keeps the area affordable despite household income sitting in the 75.2nd percentile nationally, and the median age of 35 runs 5.0 years below the national figure. Family living dominates, with 49.8% of homes carrying four or more bedrooms and an average household of 2.8 people, 0.3 above national. SEIFA places the area mid-table at IRSAD decile 5 and IRSD decile 6, while the education-and-occupation IEO index sits lower at decile 3, reflecting a workforce built on trades and mining rather than degrees.

Bucasia urban fabric map

Population

4,915

Median Age

35.0

Household IncomeiMedian weekly household income (ABS Census)

$2,005/wk

DAs (12 months)iDevelopment Applications lodged in the past year

4

Median House

$472K

Estimated from rent (2025)

10.91 km²· 450.7 people/km²· Family income $2,221/wk

At a $472,000 median house price, Bucasia is well below most coastal Queensland markets, and affordability is the headline draw: mortgage repayments average $1,666 a month, producing a mortgage-to-income ratio of just 19.2%, far under the 30% stress threshold even though household income reaches only the 75.2nd percentile. The stock suits families because 91.2% of dwellings are separate houses and 49.8% carry four or more bedrooms, with three-bedroom homes a further 38.6%. Apartments and units barely register at 1.9%, so buyers seeking low-maintenance or entry-level stock have little choice. Owner-occupiers already hold most of the market, with 44.4% paying a mortgage and 23.0% owning outright, leaving 32.6% to renters. The low debt burden relative to income means buyers here are far less exposed to rate rises than in pricier metro suburbs.

For Buyers

At a $472,000 median house price, Bucasia is well below most coastal Queensland markets, and affordability is the headline draw: mortgage repayments average $1,666 a month, producing a mortgage-to-income ratio of just 19.2%, far under the 30% stress threshold even though household income reaches only the 75.2nd percentile. The stock suits families because 91.2% of dwellings are separate houses and 49.8% carry four or more bedrooms, with three-bedroom homes a further 38.6%. Apartments and units barely register at 1.9%, so buyers seeking low-maintenance or entry-level stock have little choice. Owner-occupiers already hold most of the market, with 44.4% paying a mortgage and 23.0% owning outright, leaving 32.6% to renters. The low debt burden relative to income means buyers here are far less exposed to rate rises than in pricier metro suburbs.

For Investors

Renters make up 32.6% of households and weekly rent averages $380, which against the $472,000 median implies a gross yield near 4.2%, well above the sub-2% yields common in capital-city suburbs. The 8.8% vacancy rate is the main caution, signalling that tenant demand is not tight, so void periods can erode returns. Demand drivers are modest but positive: net overseas migration adds 26 residents a year and net internal migration adds 20, a balanced inflow rather than a surge. Development is thin at just 3 applications in 12 months, including the Royal Sands Stage 12A operational works, so new competing supply is limited. With rent-to-income at 19.0% locally, tenants have headroom, but the soft 8.8% vacancy means the case rests more on yield and affordability than on rapid rent growth, which actually fell 5.0% over the period measured.

Development Activity

Total DAs

4

Last 12 Months

4

YoY ChangeiYear-over-year change in DA lodgements

Avg DA CostiAverage estimated cost per DA in the past year

N/A

Monthly DA Lodgements

DA Categories

Subdivision
2
Deck / Pergola / Patio
1
Other
1

Schools in Bucasia iICSEA: school advantage index. 1000 = national avg, higher = more advantaged

Bucasia State School

ICSEA 962 Primary Government

Prep-6 · 476 students

Demographics

The median age of 35 is 5.0 years below the national figure, marking a younger, family-oriented population, and average household size of 2.8 sits 0.3 above national. Couples with children account for 1,820 families against 911 couples without, so child-rearing households clearly outnumber empty-nesters. The area is markedly Anglo: only 15.2% of residents were born overseas, 6.4 points below national, with English (2,106), Irish (554) and Scottish (547) the leading ancestries and Afrikaans the sole notable non-English language at just 18 speakers. University qualifications reach 17.2%, which is 12.9 points below the national rate, consistent with a workforce weighted toward trades and operational roles rather than professions. Despite the youthful median age, the trajectory is aging, with the senior share up 4.3 points and the working-age share down 2.3 points over the decade.

Age Distribution

0-14
23.4%
15-24
12.1%
25-44
28.5%
45-64
26.1%
65+
9.9%

Bedrooms

Studio/1br
4.5%
2 bed
7.1%
3 bed
38.6%
4+ bed
49.8%

Dwelling Structure

91.2%

Houses

4.4%

Townhouse

1.9%

Apartment

Tenure

Own 23.0% Mortgage 44.4% Rent 32.6%

Tenure leans firmly toward owner-occupiers: 44.4% of households carry a mortgage and 23.0% own outright, leaving renters at 32.6%. The stock is overwhelmingly detached, with separate houses at 91.2% and apartments at only 1.9%, a profile that limits density and keeps the suburb low-rise. Larger family homes dominate, as 49.8% of dwellings have four or more bedrooms and 38.6% have three, while two-bedroom stock is scarce at 7.1%. The median house price of $472,000 stays accessible relative to incomes, producing a mortgage-to-income ratio of 19.2% and rent-to-income of 19.0%, both comfortably below the 30% stress line. That low ratio exists because prices remain modest while household income sits in the 75.2nd percentile, a combination that gives both buyers and renters more breathing room than in higher-priced coastal markets.

Mortgage / mo

$1,666

Rent / wk

$380

HH Size

2.8

Personal Income / wk

$904

Vacancy Ratei% of dwellings unoccupied on Census night (ABS 2021)

8.8%

Unoccupied

160

Rent / IncomeiMedian rent as % of household income. Over 30% = housing stress

19.0%

Mortgage / IncomeiMedian mortgage as % of household income. Over 30% = housing stress

19.2%

Community Profile

Languages Spoken at Home

Afrikaans
18

Ancestry

English
2,106
Irish
554
Scottish
547
Ancestry NS
457
Other
389
German
310

Household Composition

23.4%

Couples, no children

3,899

Total families

Economy & Employment

The local economy is anchored by Healthcare at 18.0% of workers (274) and Mining at 15.6% (237), an unusual pairing that reflects both the Mackay regional health network and the Bowen Basin coal sector that drives the wider region. Construction follows at 10.2% (155), Education at 9.5% and Retail at 7.4%. By occupation, Professionals lead at 360 but Machinery Operators and Drivers are close behind at 311, with Clerical and Admin at 284, underscoring the trades-and-operations tilt. Unemployment is low at 4.4% and the full-time employment rate reaches 65.8%, helped by mining rosters that favour full-time work. Participation sits at 63.9% with 858 residents not in the labour force. SEIFA reads mid-table overall at IRSAD decile 5 and economic-resources IER decile 7, yet the IEO education-and-occupation index drops to decile 3 because degree-level qualifications are scarce despite solid mining-supported incomes.

Unemployment

2.5%

Labour Force

3,856

Unemployed

97

Quarterly Trend

Mar-24 Dec-25

Source: SALM Dec-25

Socio-Economic Indexes (SEIFA)iABS index ranking suburbs from 1 (most disadvantaged) to 10 (most advantaged)

Overall advantage
5
Disadvantage
6
Economic resources
7
Education & occupation
3

Full-time

65.8%

Part-time

29.8%

Participation

63.9%

Employed

2,305

Occupations

Professionals 360
Machinery/Drivers 311
Clerical/Admin 284
Sales 274
Community/Personal 261
Labourers 253
Managers 198

Top Industries

Healthcare 18.0%
Mining 15.6%
Construction 10.2%
Education 9.5%
Retail 7.4%

University

17.2%

Postgraduate

2.7%

Born Overseas

15.2%

Dwellings

1,648

Transport to Work

Bucasia is built around the car: 88.3% of residents drive to work while only 2.6% use public transport and 1.9% walk or cycle, reflecting a low-density coastal layout at 450.7 people per km2. No schools are recorded inside the 10.91 km2 boundary in this dataset, so families rely on nearby Mackay-area schools, a common trade-off for outer coastal suburbs. The area scores mid-table on disadvantage at IRSD decile 6 and IRSAD decile 5, neither affluent nor deprived, and only 4.0% of residents (180 people) need daily assistance. Housing pressure is light, with rent-to-income at 19.0% and mortgage-to-income at 19.2%, both well below the 30% stress threshold, so cost-of-living headroom is a genuine livability advantage. Resident stability is moderate, with 69.6% staying put against a turnover rate of 30.4%.

Drive

88.3%

Public Transport

2.6%

Walk / Cycle

1.9%

Work from Home

N/A

Population Forecast

+1.47%/yr

(+97 people/yr)

Established

Bucasia is growing steadily rather than booming, with annual population growth of 1.47%, about 97 people a year, and a 10-year change of 13.9%. The area is classified as established, with forecasts continuing the trend from 6,590 in 2025 toward a medium projection of 7,204 by 2031. Growth is balanced between net overseas migration of 26 a year and net internal migration of 20, so neither outside arrivals nor interstate movers dominate. The gentrification stage reads not gentrifying, with a low score, meaning the demographic mix is stable rather than rapidly upgrading. Affordability has actually improved over the decade, easing from 49.3% in 2011 to 40.4% in 2021, even as the trajectory ages with the senior share up 4.3 points. Real income growth was negative at minus 5.9% over the period, a headwind tied to the cyclical mining base.

Historical + Forecast

Hamilton-Perry + Holt smoothing on ERP 2001-2025

Age Cohort Forecast

Primary Driver

Balanced

Net Overseas / yr

+26

Net Internal / yr

+20

7

Gentrification Signal

Not gentrifying

Population +20% since 2011

National Ranking iPercentile rank among ~15,000 AU suburbs. 90% = higher than 90% of suburbs

How Bucasia compares to ~15,000 Australian suburbs

Population
Top 11%
Household Income
Top 25%
Rent Level
Top 21%
Apartments
Bottom 34%
Renters
Top 24%
Uni Educated
Bottom 27%
Public Transport
Bottom 42%
Born Overseas
Top 46%
Density
Top 20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bucasia a good suburb to live in?

Bucasia suits families seeking affordable space: 91.2% of homes are separate houses, 49.8% have four or more bedrooms, and housing costs are light with mortgage-to-income at just 19.2%. It scores mid-table at IRSAD decile 5, and the median age of 35 is 5.0 years below national, reflecting a younger profile.

What is the median house price in Bucasia?

The median house price is $472,000, well below most coastal Queensland markets. Weekly rent averages $380 and monthly mortgage repayments are about $1,666, giving a low mortgage-to-income ratio of 19.2%, far under the 30% stress threshold given household income in the 75.2nd percentile.

What schools are in Bucasia?

No schools are recorded inside the 10.91 km2 Bucasia boundary in this dataset, so families rely on schools in the wider Mackay area. The suburb skews young, with a median age of 35, which is 5.0 years below national, and most homes (49.8%) have four or more bedrooms suited to families.

Is Bucasia safe?

Detailed crime statistics are not available for Bucasia in this dataset. As an indirect indicator, the area scores IRSD decile 6 for relative disadvantage, mid-table nationally, and only 4.0% of residents (180 people) need daily assistance, both consistent with a stable, moderate-risk residential area.

Is Bucasia good for property investment?

Rent of $380 a week against a $472,000 median gives a gross yield near 4.2%, well above the sub-2% typical of capital cities. The 32.6% renter share offers a tenant pool, but the 8.8% vacancy rate is a caution, so the case rests on yield and affordability rather than fast rent growth.

How is Bucasia's population changing?

Population is growing 1.47% a year, about 97 people, with a 13.9% rise over 10 years, projected to reach 7,204 by 2031. Growth is balanced between net overseas migration of 26 and net internal migration of 20 a year, while the age profile is slowly aging with the senior share up 4.3 points.

How to read these comparisons

Phrases like "above the national average" reference the unweighted median across Australian suburbs with more than 1,000 residents, not population-weighted national figures. Suburb-level medians are more useful for ranking suburbs against each other; ABS census headlines are population-weighted (so dominated by Sydney and Melbourne) and can read very differently.

Current baseline (refreshed 2026-05-10): median age 40, university-educated 30.1%, born overseas 21.6%, average household size 2.5 people.

Data sources: ABS 2021 Census (demographics, income, tenure), state Valuer-General (house prices), Department of Jobs SALM (unemployment), ACARA (school ICSEA), state Crime Statistics agencies (offences), council DA portals (development applications). Population forecasts use a Hamilton-Perry cohort model calibrated to ABS ERP.

Explore Bucasia on the Map

View parcels, zoning overlays, DA applications, schools and more.

Open Interactive Map

More Suburbs in QLD