19
constraints, two fields each
every constraint carries a rating AND a separate data status, so a gap in public data is disclosed as pending, never dressed up as clean
Three things we do not have, said plainly
Road network capacity. We map how close the motorway, interchange and
arterials are, but no traffic counts, intersection performance or pavement data is
queried. The screen rates the freight task as a primary assessment matter and tells you
a Traffic Impact Assessment with intersection modelling is where the real answer lives.
It does not pretend to be that assessment.
Floor area, lease and tenant economics. We name the estates and
occupiers around the site from OpenStreetMap, but gross-lettable-area, rent evidence,
who leases which shed and tenant demand stay with your agency advice.
The hiring market and your goods profile. The labour block is the
Census backdrop of the drive-shed, not award wages, vacancy competition or recruiter
supply. And whether dangerous-goods licensing applies depends on what you store, which
the report frames against state DG thresholds instead of guessing.
What the screen does close out early, from public data:
- Freight access and existing neighbours: motorway, interchange and arterial proximity, plus the named industrial estates and occupiers the site clusters with and competes against
- Incoming supply: warehouse and logistics applications near the site and across the LGA from our own tracked records
- Zoning and overlays: is the use even open to you here, and what schedules apply
- Easements crossing the parcel: corridors that sterilise part of the buildable envelope
- Ecology and EPBC: native grassland and threatened-community triggers that add seasons to a program (the sample site sits near the Angliss Grassland reserve)
- Heritage, flood, bushfire, soils, contamination: per-constraint, each with its own data status
- Receptor separation, honestly read: GNAF address points in industrial estates are often factory units, so the sample report caps the rating and names the address to confirm instead of crying wolf
Coverage varies by state and the report says so per constraint: Victorian screens
run with full layer coverage; in NSW the Aboriginal heritage register is access
restricted and council flood mapping is partial, so those constraints are reported
pending there, not assumed clear. This is a preliminary desktop screen to support
early site selection; it is not planning advice, and it does not replace the
specialist assessments a development application requires.
