Solutions // Energy Site Screening

Desktop red flags for energy project sites.

A planning and environment screening memo for BESS, solar, wind and gas peaker candidates anywhere in Australia. 19 constraints checked against public spatial data, with statutory references and satellite exhibits per constraint. The filter you run before spending real money on consultants, not a substitute for them.

Sample screening report: site and surrounds satellite figure, Tailem Bend SA
Sample verdict
No fatal flaws identified
6 moderate · risk score 62/100 · data 100%
Re
Planning & Environment Red Flags Assessment
Project
Tailem Bend Power Precinct (sample) · gas peaker
Site
Kowald Road, Tailem Bend, South Australia, 5260, Australia · 15.8 ha
Council / State
Coorong District Council · SA

The Evidence

One real sample. Every line below is from it.

This is the actual constraint table of the sample report: a gas peaker precinct near Tailem Bend, South Australia. Each row carries its own rating and a separate data status, and in the full report each becomes a section with statutory references, sources and a satellite exhibit.

Zoning insignificant assessed · clean
Cadastral / Title & Easements moderate assessed · hit
Planning Overlays minor assessed · hit
Aboriginal Heritage moderate data limited
Historic / Federal Heritage insignificant assessed · clean
Bushfire minor assessed · hit
Flora & Fauna / Ecology moderate assessed · hit
EPBC / Matters of National Significance moderate assessed · hit
Hydrology / Flooding minor assessed · hit
Noise (residential amenity) minor assessed · hit
Visual Amenity minor assessed · hit
Contours / Topography insignificant assessed · clean
Geotechnical minor data limited
Soils insignificant assessed · clean
Utilities (power / gas / water / NBN) insignificant assessed · hit
Traffic & Access minor data limited
Contaminated Land insignificant assessed · clean
Air Quality moderate assessed · hit
Hazard & Risk (fire / explosion) moderate assessed · hit
major — potential fatal flaw moderate — needs mitigation minor — readily mitigated insignificant pending — data unavailable, disclosed as such
Bushfire constraint exhibit
Bushfire exhibit
EPBC matters of national environmental significance exhibit
EPBC / MNES exhibit
Transmission and utilities exhibit
Transmission & utilities exhibit
Full sample report Sample PDF

How It Works

Send a site. Get a memo back.

No software to adopt, no seats, no onboarding. It slots in front of your existing consultant workflow as an early filter.

01

Send one candidate site

An address, coordinates or a boundary file, plus the project type. That is all we need to start.

addresscoordinatesKML / GeoJSON
02

We run the desktop screen

19 constraints against state and federal spatial data: zoning, overlays, bushfire, flooding, EPBC, heritage, soils, transmission and more. Ratings are weighted for your project type; a gas peaker is not scored like a solar farm.

statutory referencesproject-type weighting
03

Memo + PDF within one business day

An overall verdict, per-constraint ratings and data status, satellite exhibits, nearby precedent projects, and the recommended next checks for anything a desktop screen cannot close out.

verdictsite risk scorenext steps

Honest by Design

If we can't assess it, the report says so.

19/19
constraints benchmarked
against a professional consultancy's red-flags assessment of the same sample site, with every divergence documented

What the screen is, and what it is not

Every constraint carries two separate fields: a rating and a data status. Where public data does not exist or cannot be reached, the constraint is marked pending or data-limited instead of being dressed up as clean. On the benchmark sample the screen matched the consultant's finding on every comparable constraint, and disclosed the four it cannot close from a desktop:

  • Title search — ordered from the state titles office, not public spatial data
  • Aboriginal heritage register — access to the state register is restricted
  • EPBC protected matters report — a formal PMST run accompanies a referral
  • Geotechnical — requires physical investigation on site

Coverage varies by state and the report says so per constraint. Statutory planning overlays are live for SA, VIC, NSW, QLD and WA; EPBC matters, transmission infrastructure and soils are national layers. The deepest calibration is South Australia, where the engine was built against a real consultant assessment. This is a preliminary desktop screen to support early site selection; it is not planning advice, and it does not replace the specialist assessments a development application requires.

Pricing

Priced like a filter, not a study.

A consultant desktop constraints study typically runs to five figures and takes weeks. This screen exists so you only commission those for sites that survive the first cut.

10-site credit pack

A$7,500 + GST
  • Screen a shortlist or an acquisition pipeline
  • Ranked side-by-side comparison across sites
  • Credits valid 12 months
  • Priority turnaround

Constraints that cannot be assessed from public data are disclosed as pending, never padded. If the screen returns materially less than the sample report shows for your state, we will say so before you pay.

Have a live site?

Send one real candidate site.

Address or coordinates plus project type. We reply with scope confirmation and an invoice, then the report within one business day.

Email a site Read the sample first